Due to the recent increase in scams of the sort reported here, the workload associated with this blog has become too large. Consequently, and with apologies, I am not going to update this blog any further, indefinitely.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
3 comments:
Information handled by 419 files is wrong and I am being attacked in my human rights. I am going to proceed by law.
http://419advancefeefraud.blogspot.mx/2014/04/quality-escrow-in-mexico-fake-escrow.html
1) I met Mr. Jan de Witt in person in Mexico. He told me that the money of his client was very important to him due to he ran a small company and he didn´t have guarantee with his client if something went wrong in the comercial transaction he was making.
2) He signed a contract with the company to make a comercial transaction. There is no scam to him. He was informed that he altered the contract terms and transaction was tracked by british government, due to I am a researcher and I am working in a research Project to discover traders like him doing "business" without guarantees with customers.
3) Funds in escorw were put in custody in International Court of Justice, due to Mr. De Witt didn´t want negotiate costs of damages to all parties. It is easy to make extorsion that to use rights channels to solve problems he originated.
4) If he wants his funds, he can go freely to ICJ to ask for them. He has to say in court why he didn´t follow contract and he is stating I am a scammer.
5) This is not a 419 scam because he is not an investor, and a contract is signed and prooves are availables to deal with.
Just to clarify, the link in the above comment has nothing to do with The 419 Files. I remind the reader that with regards to escrow services that trust is everything, and that both parties must trust the escrow service. I leave it to the reader to judge whether this particular case is a scam or not. Personally, anything which mentions the "International Court of Justice" looks immediately suspicious to me.
As I said, this is a transaction between two parties. Lawyers told us to let this private. Your 'suspicious' are not important to me. Thanks for your response.
You are not involved in case.
Post a Comment